Which is Stronger-Nature or Nurture essays

Which is Stronger-Nature or Nurture essays Genes are what we are all made of. The Vast History Book of our entire species condensed into a microscopic code of chemical compounds. Can cracking this code enable us to conclude a persons behavior? If you answered yes to this question, what developed our genes to be the way that they are in the first place? The answer to this, my friends, is that our genes are a product of the nurture (environment) of our ancestors, and our genes can unveil our born personality and instincts. Richard Mulcaster was right when he said that human personalities were born not made. To complete this statement, human personalities are born not made, and the environment to some extent changes the born personality. The genes determine many of the behaviors that occur in a person, but the nurture throughout that persons life develops, and really shapes the genes for the next generation and this is the endless evolutionary chain. Every generation of genes starts where the genitor left off. This is to say that the genitor passes down the genes, the genes having evolved from the genitors experiences, and continues to evolve from the offsprings experiences. Okay, so which came first, the chicken or the egg? Well, the truth is, we dont know. Monkeys have an inborn greater potential to fear snakes rather than to fear flowers. This is because the environment provides a reason for monkeys to fear snakes such as snakebite. This bite cause a gene, lets say the fear snakes gene, to have a greater tendency to turn on (or be more susceptible to turn on). A monkeys ancestors have never been provided with a reason to fear flowers, so the fear flower gene was never turned on, giving a small susceptibility to fearing flowers. This concept shows why there is a vast variety in personalities among people, everybody comes from a different ancestry, and also proves why identical twins have been found to have very similar behaviors, also brothers...

Analytical Essay on The Crucible

Analytical Essay on The Crucible Analytical Essay on The Crucible The Crucible is a play by Arthur Miller that was written and published in 1953. It is loosely based on facts about Salem witch trials that happened in 1692 and 1693. On the other hand, the play is believed to be an allegory on McCarthyism, the practice of accusing people without having enough evidence. Thus, both have striking resemblance, and the author wanted to show how helpless and doomed a person might be when unfairly accused by those in power (e.g. court, state, police). Salem witch trial and allegory on McCarthyism are the two levels of this plays interpretation (the explicit and the implicit ones). Those, who are not familiar with the context in which the play was written, will more likely not understand the implicit meaning of it. The play is a playwrights reaction to events that took place during the McCarthy era in the first half of 1950s. A lot of Americans were accused of being communists, spreading communist propaganda, or being soviet spies. Very often such accusations were false, however it soon developed into mass hysteria, with many people becoming victims of such injustice. Arthur Miller saw similarities between McCarthyism and Salem witch trials which resulted in writing this play. Talking about the main characters, we can point out an antagonist and a protagonist: Abigail Williams and John Proctor respectively. It all started when they both had an affair while Abigail worked as a maid for the Proctor house. In fact, it was Abigail who accused a slave woman of being a witch trying to explain reverend Parris daughter illness. Soon she realizes that such accusations can be used as a means of manipulating people, for example accusing Proctors wife of witchcraft is a way to be with Proctor again. Other people join Abigail even if they know that accusations are false, but they realize that it is better to accuse someone rather than be accused themselves. This mass hysteria is supported by people who have authority: judge John Hathorne and deputy governor Thomas Danforth. The author draws a parallel between the authority in Salem and the U.S. Government in the 50s, who were both too blind and ignorant to see that all the accusations were made by people because their own self-interest, or just because of foolishness. The protagonist, John Proctor, trying to save his wife was also accused of witchcraft by Abigail. He has to make a choice: understanding all the absurd of the trial, he may confess to being guilty and save his life, but be condemned by all the citizens of Salem for the rest of his life, or to deny all the accusations and be sentenced to death, but having a clear conscience. So, he chooses the latter. Arthur Millers play shows us how cruel and foolish people may be, no matter whether it is the 17th century, or the 20th. With all the technological and scientific progress that happened during this period, he doubts that people have become any wiser. He also depicts authority as a cruel machine that is only capable of imposing punishment to people without even knowing whether they are guilty or not. Tips on Writing an Analytical Essay on a Work of Fiction: When analyzing a work of fiction, try focusing on a specific character, concept or a story line. Make an attention catching claim in your thesis statement. For that, two sentences would be enough. Use examples from the work of fiction you are analyzing to support the claim you have made. That is also a good indicator that you have read the work carefully enough to notice the details. An outline always apply. Whatever kind of essay you are writing, an outline will help you to keep your thoughts organized. provides students with custom written essays on different topics. You can buy analytical essay online and your paper will be written by certified writers.